Issue 2 (32) 2016

 

Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016. Issue 2 (32)
Title: THE PRINCIPLE OF GOOD FAITH AS AN ELEMENT OF THE LEGAL MECHANISM FOR STIMULATING THE DEBTOR TO PROPER EXECUTION OF OBLIGATIONS AND GUARANTEEING CREDITORS' INTERESTS: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL AND ARBITRATION PRACTICE
Authors: Golubtsov V.G.
Perm State University		 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0003-3505-2348 ResearcherID: H-4690-2015
«Scopus» & «Web of Science» article:

10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.pl.14010
10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.15.8.11538
10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.24.01.13176
10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.24.01.13177
Requisites: Golubtsov V. G. Printsip dobrosovestnosti kak element pravovogo mekhanizma stimulirovaniya dolzhnika k nadlezhashchemu ispolneniyu obyazatel’stv i garantirovaniya interesov kreditorov: analiz sudebno-arbitrazhnoy praktiki [The Principle of Good Faith as an Element of the Legal Mechanism for Stimulating the Debtor to Proper Execution of Obligations and Guaranteeing Creditors’ Interests: Analysis of Judicial and Arbitration Practice]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016. Issue 32. Pp. 175–184. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-32-175-184
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-32-175-184
Annotation: Introduction: from June 1, 2015 came into force the Federal Law of the Russian Federation dated 8 March 2015, No. 42-FZ (hereinafter – Law № 42-FZ) «On Amendments to Part One of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation», providing a number of innovations in legal regulation of contractual relations. Purpose: to address the problem, important for the development of Russian civil law, connected with revealing the principle of good faith as an element of legal mechanism for stimulating the debtor to proper execution of obligations and guaranteeing interests of creditors on the basis of the latest court and arbitration practice analysis. Methods: the following methods were used in the course of research: a general scientific dialectic method, universal scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison, abstraction, formal logical, systemic-structural), methods specific to legal science (a comparative legal method, systemic interpretation, a method of legal modeling). Results: a number of fundamental questions concerning optional obligations have not received proper authorization in the civil law doctrine. Main vectors for further development of good faith principles in legislation and law enforcement activity have been specified. Conclusions: the criteria of good faith of contractual law participants and their correct practical application will certainly promote to the establishment of optimal balance of the creditors’ and debtor’s interests, which is an essential guarantee for the maintenance of business cooperation, as well as for prevention of legal conflicts. It will also help to satisfy interests of property turnover participants. The principle of good faith needs further implementation into the special norms of the Civil Code since it is one of the essential guarantees for the realization of subjective civil rights.
Keywords: principle of good faith; principle of promotion of the parties; mechanism of stimulating the debtor to proper execution of obligations; proper execution of obligations; good faith criteria
  download the full-version article
References:

Arkhipova A. G. Doktrina uberrima fides v strakhovanii i ee voploshchenie v rossiyskom prave [The Doctrine Of Uberrima Fides in Insurance and Its Embodiment in the Russian Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2015. Issue 4. Pp. 7–35. (In Russ.).
Bogacheva T. V. Printsipy vzaimnogo sodey­stviya storon i ekonomichnosti v dogovornykh obyazatel'stvakh: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk [The Principles of Mutual Assistance of The Parties and Efficiency in the Contractual Obligations: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 1982. 24 p. (In Russ.).
Bogdanov D. E. Novelly grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF s pozitsii kontseptsii dobrosovestnoy posledovatel'nosti v deystviyakh i zayavleniyakh [Amendments to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in Terms of the Concept of Conscientious Sequence in the Actions And Statements]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika – Law And Economics.2016. Issue 2. Pp. 44–49. (In Russ.).
Karapetov A. G. Zavereniya ob obstoyatel'st­vakh i usloviya o vozmeshchenii poter' v novoy redaktsii GK RF [Assurance of Circumstances and Provisions for Loss Recovery in the New Version of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Zakon – Zakon. 2015.
Issue 6. Pp. 43–56. (In Russ.).
Kuznetsova O. A. Pryamoe (neposredstvennoe) deystvie printsipov grazhdanskogo prava [Direct (Immediate) Application of Civil Law Principles]. Notarius – Notary.2006. Issue 1. Pp. 37–40. (In Russ.).
Kulakov V. V. O roli printsipov grazhdanskogo prava v pravovom regulirovanii obshchestvennykh otnosheniy [About the Role of Civil Law Principles in Legal Regulation of Social Relations]. Nauchnye vozzreniya professora G. F. Shershenevicha v sovremennykh usloviyakh konvergentsii chastnogo i publichnogo prava (k 150-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya): sb. materialov mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Kazan', 1–2 marta 2013 g.) / pod red. D. Kh. Valeeva, K. Ronchki, Z. F. Safina, M. Yu. Chelysheva. [Scientific Views of Professor G.F. Shershenevitch in the Current Context of Convergence of Private and Public Law (to the 150th birth anniversary): Proceedings of Intern. Science and Practice Conf. (Kazan, March 1–2, 2013); ed. by D. Kh. Valeev, K. Rocki, Z. F. Safin, M. Y. Chelysheva]. Moscow, 2014. Pp. 50–52. (In Russ.).
Kulakov V., Filippova S. Poigraem v perevozku [Let's Play a Transportation Game]. EZh-Yurist – EJ-Lawyer.2015. Issue 44. Pp. 13–20. (In Russ.).
Problemy realizatsii printsipov prava v predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti / V. K. Andreev, L. V. Andreeva, K. M. Arslanov i dr.; otv. red. V. A. Vaypan, M. A. Egorova. [V. K. Andreev, L.V. Andreeva, K. M. Arslanov et al. Problems of Implementation of the Law Principles in Entrepreneurial Activity; resp. eds.: V. A. Vipan, M. A. Egorova]. Moscow, 2016. 340 p. (In Russ.).
Khokhlov V. A. Obshchie polozheniya ob obyazatel'stvakh: ucheb. posobie. [General Provisions On Obligations: Textbook]. Moscow, 2015. 288 p. (In Russ.).
Chumakov A. A. Vedenie peregovorov po novym pravilam: novelly Zakona № 42-FZ [The Negotiation on New Rules: Amendments to Law № 42]. Zakon – Zakon. 2015. Issue 6. Pp. 77–82. (In Russ.).
Herbots J. Contract Law in Belgium. Deventer, Boston, 1995. 181 p. (In Eng.).
Marianne, M. Jennings. Business: Its Legal, Ethical and Global Environment. Cengage Learning, 2010. 684 p. (In Eng.).
Markesinis B.S., Lorenz W., Dannemann G. The German Law of Obligations. Vol. 1. The Law of Contract and Restitutions: A Com­parative Introduction. Oxford, 1997. 487 p. (In Eng.).
Marsh P. D. V. Comparative Contract Law. England, France, Germany. Hampshire, 1996. 331 p. (In Eng.).
Pescatore G. Die sogenante alternative Obligation. Marb., 1880. 280 p. (In French).
Petersen L. L., Orgaard N. Danish Insolvency Law. Copenhagen, 1996. 94 p. (In Eng.).
Principles of European Contract Law. Part I and II; ed. by Ole Lando, Hugh Beale. The Hague, London, 2000. 83 p. (In Eng.).
Samuel G., Rinkes J. The English law of obligations in comparative context. Nijmegen, 1991. 177 p. (In Eng.).
Towards a European Civil Code; ed. by A. S. Hartkamp, M. W. Hesselink, E. H. Hon­dius, C. E. du Perron, J.B.M. Vranken. London, 1994. 345 p. (In Eng.).
Zimmermann R. The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Deventer, Boston, 1992. 246 p. (In Eng.).
Financing: Статья подготовлена при финансовой поддержке РГНФ – грант № 16-03-00741«Система правовых механизмов стимулирования должника к надлежащему исполнению обязательств и гарантирования интересов кредитора в российском гражданском праве»
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year