Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016. Issue 2 (32) |
||||||||||
Title: | CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CITIZENS TO APPEAL WITHIN THE LEGAL AND REGULATORY REGIME FOR INTERACTION BETWEEN CITIZENS AND PUBLIC CONTROL AND ADMINISTRATION AUTHORITIES | |||||||||
Authors: | Shirobokov S.A. Perm State University |
![]() |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0001-7933-473X | ResearcherID: | E-7942-2016 | |||||||
«Scopus» & «Web of Science» article: | --- | |||||||||
Requisites: | Shirobokov S. A. Konstitutsionnoe pravo grazhdan na obrashchenie v sisteme pravovogo regulirovaniya vzaimodejstviya grazhdan i organov gosudarstvennoj vlasti i upravleniya [Constitutional Rights of Citizens to Appeal within the Legal and Regulatory Regime for Interaction between Citizens and Public Control and Administration Authorities]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016. Issue 32. Pp. 158–164. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-32-158-164 | |||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-32-158-164 | |||||||||
Annotation: | Introduction: the article deals with the special meaning given to the interaction between citizens and public control and administration authorities in terms of citizens’ constitutional right to appeal, as well as to innovative directions of the development of legal regulation of the constitutional right to appeal. Purpose: to substantiate the point that qualitative certainty of the constitutional right to appeal is determined by its links with many other legal phenomena. The right to appeal is a universal and fundamental one as a category of a tool subsystem within the legal system. Thus, it is impossible for a citizen to exercise their rights and freedoms beyond this category. Methods: as a methodological framework, a system of philosophical knowledge is used, according to which the author formulates the main criteria for requirements to scientific theories, to the study of the social life phenomenon and to individual opportunities. The methodology is based on the general scientific dialectical method of cognition, which includes the following specific scientific methods: the system structural approach, legal planning method, sociological, technical legal methods, and comparative analysis methods. Conclusions: the implementation of the citizens’ constitutional right to appeal requires constant attention on the part of public control and administration authorities. The high efficiency level in the legal regulation of the right under study can only be achieved as a result of scientific justification and assumptions. Appeals of citizens as part of their participation in the state affairs is a universal legal category. Almost all legal categories of the legal status of an individual in the state are realized due to the citizens’ right to appeal. | |||||||||
Keywords: | constitutional right to appeal; development of legal regulation; procedures for consideration of citizens’ appeals; participation of citizens in managing the state affairs; increasing degree of citizens’ confidence in the activities of state bodies and officials; legislation concerning citizens’ right to appeal | |||||||||
![]() |
download the full-version article |
|||||||||
References: |
Alistratov Yu. N. Pravo petitsiy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The Right to Petition in the Russian Federation]. Moscow, 1997. 92 p. (In Russ.). |
|||||||||
Financing: | --- |