Issue 2 (12) 2011

PERPETUATION OF LEGITIMATE INTEREST OF THE SUSPECT (ACCUSED) PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 401 OF RF CPC

PERPETUATION OF LEGITIMATE INTEREST OF THE SUSPECT (ACCUSED) PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 40¹ OF RF CPC

G.Ya. Borisevich

Perm State University. 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

The issues of perpetuation of the legitimate interest of the suspect (accused) when concluding a pretrial cooperation agreement are studied. The role of guarantees of defense of the legitimate interest is shown. Recommendations for improvement of Criminal Procedure Law and improvement of quality of operation of law are given.

Keywords: legitimate interest of the suspect (accused) provided for in the article 40 of the CPC of the RF;  guarantees of defense of legitimate interest (of the right of the suspect (accused) of the defendant,  duties of the chief of the investigative authority, investigator, prosecutor and judge)

1. Belokovyl'skijj M.S., Gurtovenko Eh.S. Spornye voprosy glavy 401 UPK RF // Problemy primenenija dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve po ugolovnym delam. Izhevsk, 2010. S. 70–78.
2. Bjulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2010. №11. S. 28–29.
3. Velikijj D.P. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve v rossijjskom ugolovnom processe // Zhurnal ros. prava. 2010. №2. S. 84–90.
4. Zuev S. Novaja glava UPK // Zakonnost'. 2009. №9. S. 17–18.
5. Il'in A.V. Primenenie polozhenijj glavy 401 UPK RF Sledstvennym upravleniem pri MVD po Udmurtskojj respublike // Problemy primenenija dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve po ugolovnym delam. Izhevsk, 2010. S. 28.
6. Konjarova Zh.K. Storony dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovno-processual'noe zakonodatel'stvo v sovremennykh uslovijakh: problemy teorii i praktiki. M.: Volters Kluver, 2010. S. 192.
7. Kucova Eh.F. Garantii prav lichnosti v sovetskom ugolovnom processe. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1972. S. 8.
8. Martynchik E.G. Garantii prav obvinjaemogo v sude pervojj instancii. Kishinev: Shtiinca, 1975. S. 36.  
9. Smirnov A.V. Osobyjj porjadok prinjatija reshenija pri zakljuchenii dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnyjj process.  2009.  №10. S. 5–14.
10. Tat'janin D.V. Vozmozhno li zakljuchenie soglashenija o sotrudnichestve po ugolovnym de-lam o prestuplenijakh, rassleduemykh v forme doznanija? // Problemy primenenija dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve po ugolovnym delam. Izhevsk, 2010. S. 40.
11. Khlybov M.A. Juridicheskaja priroda instituta dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve // Problemy primenenija dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve po ugolovnym delam. Izhevsk, 2010. S. 85–86.