|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022. Issue 2 (56) |
||||||||||
| Title: | LEGAL REGIME OF SMART CONTRACTS: A CODE OR A CONTRACT |
|||||||||
| Authors: |
A. A. Krytsula, North Caucasian Branch of the Russian State University of Justice |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
|
|||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0001-9017-7894 |
ResearcherID: | ААЕ-6646-2022 |
|||||||
| Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
| Requisites: | Krytsula A. A. Pravovoy rezhim smart-kontraktov: kod ili dogovor [Legal Regime of Smart Contracts: a Code or a Contract]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022. Issue 56. Pp. 239–267. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-56-239-267 |
|||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-56-239-267 |
|||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: the article is devoted to the analysis of legal regulation of smart contracts, the concept, content, and scope of their application. The author analyzes in detail foreign experience of using smart contracts and suggests possible options for expanding the application area. The article also has a separate section that looks at smart contracts as compared with traditional institutions of civil law. Smart contracts are expected to find application in almost all areas of life in the future. As is often the case with new technologies, the use of smart contracts raises a number of civil law issues. Blockchain technology makes it possible not only to create new means of payment but also to autonomously manage almost any process. It can be used for individual contracts and even for the creation of autonomous decentralized systems. Purpose: to provide an insight into the institution of smart contracts and define their role in civil law. Methods: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic; special scientific methods such as the legal-dogmatic method, the methods of interpretation of legal norms and comparative legal research. Results: smart contracts are computer programs that perform legally significant actions according to predetermined algorithms set out in the form of a so-called program code. In practice, they are especially important in connection with the development of blockchain technology or (more generally) distributed ledger technology. Conclusions: the term ‘smart contract’ was defined by Nick Szabo in the 1990s as a sequence of commands represented in digital form, including transaction protocols that execute these agreements. Thus, smart contracts formulate rules and sanctions for agreements and execute them automatically. These are not necessarily contracts in the legal sense, but they are capable of controlling, tracking, and documenting legally significant actions. Smart contracts can also be implemented using traditional, for example, mechanical technologies (e.g. in a vending machine). However, blockchain and distributed ledger technologies make it possible to implement incomparably more complex rules and enforcement mechanisms and offer a decentralized environment with an integrated settlement system. From a legal point of view, smart contracts perform two functions. On the one hand, they serve as a functional equivalent of a contract since their technological code can identify the services to be exchanged as well as the conditions under which they must be provided. Being the normative order of the digital, this code formulates the program of obligations of the parties. It resembles the legal order of a contract, without necessarily coinciding with it. On the other hand, smart contracts serve as a tool for the execution of contracts – by controlling, monitoring, and documenting the exchange of services. They can also facilitate the execution of conventional contracts by translating their provisions into a technical code, verifying the occurrence of agreed-upon events, and enforcing contracts. Smart contracts are suitable for contractual relationships, for example, for processing payments or delivering goods without the participation of the parties and an intermediate step in the form of direct execution. Smart contracts are gaining more and more popularity, especially in the financial sector. In addition to the so-called token economy (cryptocurrencies, ICO, etc.), there are also discussed algorithmic ETFs, online platforms for loans or project financing. Another important area of application is sharing economy. From a legal point of view, smart contracts can either be the subject of a contractual agreement or generate it on their own. There is sometimes put forward a thesis under the motto ‘Code is law’ that smart contracts give rise to a largely autonomous legal system and/ or are not subject to applicable law. However, this appears to be an erroneous conclusion. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | smart contract; digital code; automated (self-executing) contract; e-commerce; online trading; digital economy; blockchain technology; contract form; fulfillment of an obligation |
|||||||||
 |
download the full-version article | |||||||||
| References: | 1. Arnold S. Vertrag und Verteilung: Die Bedeu¬tung der iustitia distributiva im Vertrags-recht. Mohr Siebeck, 2014. XX, 489 p. (In Germ.). 2. Azouvi S., Al-Bassam M., Meiklejohn S. Who Am I? Secure Identity Registration on Distributed Ledgers. Data Privacy Management, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology. 2017. Pp. 373–389. (In Eng.). 3. Badura P., Kaiser J. Parlamentarische Gesetzgebung und Geltungsanspruch des Rechts. 1987. 74 p. (In Germ.). 4. Self-Regulation in Private Law in Japan and Germany. Ed. by H. Baum, M. Bälz, M. Dernauer. Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht. Special Issue 11. 2018. 282 p. (In Eng.). 5. Bayern S., Burri T., Grant T., Häuser-mann D., Möslein F., Williams R. Gesell¬schafts-recht und autonome Systeme im Rechtsvergleich. Aktuelle Juristische Praxis (AJP). 2017. Issue 2. Pp. 192–203. (In Germ.). 6. Bork R. Allgemeiner Teil des Bürger-lichen Gesetzbuchs. 4th ed. 2016. 767 р. (In Germ.). 7. Rechtshandbuch Smart Contracts. Ed. by T. Brae¬gelmann, M. Kaulartz. Munich: C. H. BECK, 2019. 274 p. (In Germ.). 8. Möslein G. Rechtsgeschäftslehre und Smart Contracts. Rechtshandbuch Smart Con-tracts. Ed. by T. Braegelmann, M. Kaulartz. Munich: C.H. BECK, 2019. Pp. 81–98. (In Germ.). 9. Busche J. Privatautonomie und Kontra¬hierungszwang. 1999. 722 p. (In Germ.). 10. Bydlinski F. Privatautonomie und objek¬tive Grundlagen des verpflichtenden Rechts¬geschäftes. 1967. 231 p. (In Germ.). 11. 3e Journée des droits de la consommation et de la distribution: Blockchain et Smart Contracts – Défis juridiques. Ed. by B. Carron, C. Müller. 2018. 179 p. (In Fr.). 12. Chetrit N., Danor M., Shavit A., Yona B., Greenbaum D. Not Just for Illicit Trade in Contraband Anymore: Using Blockchain to Solve a Millennial-Long Problem with Bills of Lading. Virginia Journal of Law & Technology. 2018. Vol. 22. Issue 1. Pp. 60-117. (In Eng.). 13. Corea F. Applied Artificial Intelligence: Where AI Can Be Used in Business. Springer International Publishing, 2019. 48 p. (In Eng.). 14. Corkery M., Silver-Greenberg J. Miss a Payment? Good Luck Moving that Car. New York Times Dealbook. September 24, 2014. Available at: https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/09/24/miss- a-payment-good-luck-moving-that-car/. (In Eng.). 15. Damler D. Das gesetzlich privilegierte Muster im Privatrecht. Mohr Siebeck, 2015. 186 p. (In Germ.). 16. Dietlein J. Die Lehre von den grund-rechtlichen Schutzpflichten. 2nd ed. 2005. 250 p. (In Germ.). 17. Djazayeri A. Rechtliche Herausforde-rungen durch Smart Contracts. jurisPR-BKR. 2016. Issue 12. (In Germ.). 18. Djurovic M., Janssen A. The Formation of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts in the Light of Contract Law. European Review of Private Law. 2018. Vol. 26. Issue 6. Pp. 753–772. (In Eng.). 19. Eschenbruch K. Bauvertragsmanagement: Gestaltung, Änderung und Abwicklung von Verträgen sowie Konfliktbewältigung bei Bau¬projekten. Werner Verlag, 2017. 436 p. (In Germ.). 20. Eschenbruch K., Gerstberger R. Smart Contracts. Planungs-, Bau- und Immo¬bi¬lien¬ver-träge als Programm? Neue Zeit¬schrift für Baurecht und Vergaberecht. München (Deutsch¬land): Beck Jg.19, 2018. Issue 1. (In Germ.). 21. De Filippi P., Wright A. Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Cambridge, Massa¬chusetts: Harvard University Press, 2018. 312 p. (In Eng.). 22. Flume W. Allgemeiner Teil des Bürger-lichen Rechts. 4th ed. 1992. 989 p. (In Germ.). 23. Fries M. Automatische Rechtspflege. RW Rechtswissenschaft. 2018. Vol. 9. Issue 4. Pp. 414–430. (In Germ.). 24. Fries M. Smart Contracts: Brauchen schlaue Verträge noch Anwälte. Anwaltsblatt. 2018. Vol. 2. Pp. 86–90. (In Germ.). 25. Fries M. Verbraucherrechtsdurchsetzung. Mohr Siebeck, 2020. 309 p. (In Germ.). 26. Furrer A. Der Einsatz der Blockchain in der Logistik. Jusletter. 2017. Issue 4. 8 p. (In Germ.). 27. Gitter R., Roßnagel A. Rechtsfragen mo¬bi¬ler Agentensysteme im E-Commerce. Kom-mu¬nikation und Recht (K&R). 2003. Issue 2. Pp. 64–72. (In Germ.). 28. Glaeser W. Der freiheitliche Staat des Grundgesetzes. 3rd ed. 2016. 365 p. (In Germ.). 29. Golumbia D. The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right-Wing Extremism. University of Minnesota Press, 2016. 100 p. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3178393. (In Eng.). 30. Greenleaf G. An Endnote on Regulating Cyberspace: Architecture vs Law? University of New South Wales Law Journal. 1998. Vol. 21. Issue 2. Pp. 593–622. (In Eng.). 31. Groß N., Gressel J. Entpersonalisierte Arbeitsverhältnisse als rechtliche Herausforderung – Wenn Roboter zu Kollegen und Vorgesetzten warden. Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht. 2016. Vol. 33. Issue 16. Pp. 990–996. (In Germ.). 32. Heckelmann M. Zulässigkeit und Hand¬habung von Smart Contracts. Neue Ju¬ris¬ti-sche Wochenschrift. 2018. Vol. 71. Issue 8. Pp. 504–510. (In Germ.). 33. Heckmann J. DAO-Hack – Smart Con-tracts auf dem rechtlichen Prüfstand. CRaktuell 2016, R 99 f (In Germ.). 34. Hippel F. Das Problem der rechts-geschäftlichen Privatautonomie. 1936. Pp. 91–105. (In Germ.). 35. Hobbes T. Leviathan. Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 2007. Pp. 478–500. (In Eng.). 36. Hohn-Hein N., Barth G. Immaterial-güterrechte in der Welt von Blockchain und Smart Contract. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urhe¬ber¬recht. 2018. Issue 120. Pp. 1089–1096. (In Germ.). 37. Husserl G. Rechtskraft und Rechts-geltung: eine rechtsdogmatische Untersuchung. 1925. 39 p. (In Germ.). 38. Kaulartz M. Smart World – Smart Law? DSRI Tagungsband Herbstakademie, 2016. 599 p. (In Germ.). 39. Kaulartz M. Smart Contract Dispute Re¬so¬lution. Smart Contracts. Ed. by M. Fries, B. P. Paal. Mohr Siebeck, 2019. Pp. 73–74. (In Germ.). 40. Kaulartz M. Rechtliche Grenzen bei der Gestaltung von Smart Contracts. Smart World – Smart Law? Weltweite Netze mit Regionaler Regulierung. Ed. by J. Taeger. Tagungsband DSRI-Herbstakademie. 2016. Pp. 1023–1028. (In Germ.). 41. Kaulartz M., Heckmann J. Smart Con-tracts – Anwendungen der Blockchain-Tech¬no-logie. Computer und Recht. 2016. Vol. 32. Issue 9. Pp. 618–624. (In Germ.). 42. Kelly K. The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future. 2016. 336 p. (In Eng.). 43. Entgrenzungen des Konsums. Ed. by P. Kenning, J. Lamla. 2018. 104 p. (In Germ.). 44. Kiffer L., Levin D., Mislove A. Analyzing Ethereum's Contract Typology. Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018. 2018. Pp. 494-499. Available at: https://mislove.org/pub¬li¬cations/Ethereum-IMC.pdf. (In Eng.). 45. Kling M. Sprachrisiken im Privatrechts¬verkehr. 2008. 322 p. (In Germ.). 46. Köhler H. Die Problematik automa¬ti-sierter Rechtsvorgänge, insbesondere von Willenserklärungen. Archiv für die civilistische Praxis (AcP). 1982. Vol. 182. Issue 1/2. Pp. 126–171. (In Germ.). 47. Neue Vertragsformen der Wirtschaft: Leasing, Factoring, Franchising. Ed. by E. Kramer. 2nd ed. 1992. Pp. 30–37. (In Germ.). 48. Lessig L. Code Is Law: On Liberty in Cyberspace. Harvard Magazine. 2000. Available at: https://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-html. (In Eng.). 49. Lobe A. Wenn der Algorithmus Selbst-justiz übt. Süddeutsche Zeitung. April 8, 2018. Available at: http://www.sued¬deutsche.de/di¬gi-tal/smart-contracts-wenn-der-algorithmus-selbst-justiz-uebt-1.3934283. (In Germ.). 50. Lorenz S. Der Schutz vor dem uner-wünschten Vertrag. 1997. Pp. 28–43. (In Germ.). 51. Manssen G. Privatrechtsgestaltung durch Hoheitsakt: Verfassungsrechtliche und Verwal¬tungs¬rechtliche Grundfragen. 1994. 414 p. (In Germ.). 52. Mayninger S. Die künstliche Person. 2017. 260 p. (In Germ.). 53. Mittelstädt M. Die Auslegung empfangs–bedürftiger Willenserklärungen. 2016. 43 p. (In Germ.). 54. Möslein F. Legal Boundaries of Block-chain Technologies: Smart Contracts as Self-Help? Digital Revolution – New Challenges for Law. Ed. by A. De Franceschi, R. Schulze, M. Graziadei, O. Pollicino, F. Riente, S. Sica, P. Sirena. 2019. Forthcoming. Pp. 313–326. (In Eng.). 55. Möslein F. Regulating Blockchain: Techno-Social and Legal Challenges. Oxford University Press, 2019. Pp. 3–34. (In Eng.). 56. Möslein F. Dispositives Recht: Zwecke, Strukturen und Methoden. Mohr Siebeck, 2011. 640 p. (In Germ.). 57. Möslein F. Finanzinnovation als Rechtsproblem. Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft. 2013. Vol. 25. Issue 1. Pp. 1–16. (In Germ.). 58. Möslein F. Smart Contracts im Zivil- und Handelsrecht. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht. 2019. Vol. 183. Issue 2–3. Pp. 254–293. (In Germ.). 59. Pargendler M. The Role of the State in Contract Law: The Common-Civil Law Divide. Yale Journal of International Law. 2018. Vol. 43. Issue 1. Pp. 143–189. (In Eng.). 60. Paulus D., Matzke R. Smart Contracts und das BGB Viel Lärm um nichts? Zeitschrift für die gesamte Privatrechtswissenschaft. 2018. Pp. 431465. (In Germ.). 61. Poscher R. Grundrechte als Abwehr-rechte: Reflexive Regelung Rechtlich Geordneter Freiheit. 2003. 449 p. (In Germ.). 62. Blockchain und Smart Contracts. Technologien, Forschungsfragen und Anwendungen (Studie der Frauenhofer-Gesellschaft). Ed. by W. Prinz, A. Schulte. 2017. 50 p. (In Germ.). 63. Prütting H. FS Schlosser. 2005. 227 p. (In Germ.). 64. Raskin M. The Law and Legality of Smart Contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Review. 2017. Vol. 1. Pp. 305–341. (In Eng.). 65. Reidenberg J. Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology. Texas Law Review. 1998. Vol. 76. Issue 3. Pp. 553–593. (In Eng.). 66. Remien O. Zwingendes Vertragsrecht und Grundfreiheiten des EG-Vertrages. 2003. 678 p. (In Germ.). 67. Riesenhuber K. System und Prinzipien des europäischen Vertragsrechts. 2003. 660 p. (In Germ.). 68. Rodrigues U. R. Law and the Blockchain. Iowa Law Review. 2019. Vol. 104. Issue 2. Pp. 679–729. (In Eng.). 69. Ruffert M. Vorrang der Verfassung und Eigenständigkeit des Privatrechts. Eine verfas-sungs¬rechtliche Untersuchung zur Privatrechts-entwicklung des Grundgesetzes. 2001. 614 p. (In Germ.). 70. Savelyev A. Contract Law 2.0: 'Smart' Contracts as the Beginning of the End of Classic Contract Law. Information & Communications Technology Law. 2017. Vol. 26. Issue 2. Pp. 116–134. (In Eng.). 71. Schirmer J.-E. Rechtsfähige Roboter? JuristenZeitung. 2016. Vol. 71. Issue 13. Pp. 660–666. (In Germ.). 72. Schrey J., Thalhofer T. Rechtliche As-pekte der Blockchain. Neue Juristische Wochen¬schrift. 2017. Vol. 70. Issue 20. Pp. 14311436. (In Germ.). 73. Schulz T. Verantwortlichkeit bei autonom agierenden Systemen. 2014. 105 p. (In Germ.). 74. Schwab D., Löhnig M. Einführung in das Zivilrecht. 20th ed. C. F. Müller GmbH, 2016. 459 p. (In Germ.). 75. Simmchen C. Blockchain (R)Evolution. Verwendungsmöglichkeiten und Risiken. Multi¬Media und Recht. 2017. Issue 3. Pp. 162–165. (In Germ.). 76. Spindler G., Schuster F. Recht der Elek¬tro¬nischen Medien. 3rd ed. 2015. § 130. 2927 p. (In Germ.). 77. von Staudinger J. BGB: Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungs-gesetz und Nebengesetzen. 2017. 956 p. (In Germ.). 78. Stoffels M. Gesetzlich nicht geregelte Schuldverträge. 2001. 694 p. (In Germ.). 79. Szabo N. Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks. 2017. Available at: https://nakamotoinstitute.org/formalizing-securing-relationships. (In Eng.). 80. Szabo N. Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks. First Monday. 1997. Vol. 2. Issue 9. Available at: http://first¬mon-day.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/548/469–publisher=First. (In Eng.). 81. Szabo N. Lecture on Blockchains and Smart Contracts at Lykke. 2016. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWuN2R2DC6c. (In Eng.). 82. Szabo N. Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets. 1996. Available at: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool 2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_contracts_2.html. (In Eng.). 83. Szabo N. Smart Contracts. 1994. Available at: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/ Courses/In¬for-mationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/ LOTwin-ter¬school2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart. con¬t-racts.html. (In Eng.). 84. Tapscott D., Tapscott A. The Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World. New York: Penguin Random House, 2016. 348 p. (In Eng.). 85. Teubner G. Digitale Rechtssubjekte? Ar¬chiv für die civilistische Praxis (AcP). 2018. Issue 218. Pp. 155–205. (In Germ.). 86. Werbach K., Cornell N. Contracts Ex Machina. Duke Law Journal. 2017. Vol. 67. Issue 2. Pp. 313382. 87. Werbach K. Trust, but Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law. Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 2018. Vol. 33. Issue 2. Pp. 487550. (In Eng.). 88. Westermann H. Vertragsfreiheit und Typen¬gesetzlichkeit im Recht der Personen¬ge-sell¬schaften. 1970. 490 p. (In Germ.). 89. Wieacker F. Review of 'Allgemeiner Teil des Deutschen Bürgerlichen Rechts'. Ein Lehr¬buch, by K. Larenz. Archiv für die Civilistische Praxis. 1968. Vol. 168. Issue 5/6. Pp. 522–532. (In Germ.). |
|||||||||
| Received: | 03.03.2022 | |||||||||
| Financing: |
--- |
|||||||||
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year