Issue 2 (44) 2019

 

Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 2 (44)
Title: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS ACQUIRING PROTECTION IN THE 21st CENTURY
Authors:

A. G. Matveev, Perm State University

 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-5808-939X
 ResearcherID: F-1946-2016
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-33-348-353
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-484-496

V. N. Sinelnikova, National Research University Higher School of Economics

 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-4544-0005
 ResearcherID: : L-1496-2015
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2019-1-58-62
Requisites: Matveev A. G., Sinelnikova V. N. Ob"ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti, poluchayushhie okhranu v XXI v. [Intellectual Property Objects Acquiring Protection in the 21st Century]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 2. Pp. 281–309. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-44-281-309
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-44-281-309
Annotation:

Introduction: efficient legal protection of intellectual outputs is essential for the dynamic development of modern society. The list of intellectual property objects is not intended to be exhaustive, separate outputs lose their relevance and become excluded from the list of protected objects, while new ones, on the contrary, are added to it. Purpose: this work aims to identify the tendencies regarding the extension of the range of intellectual property objects at the beginning of the 21st century, and to define the scientific and technological progress results that were granted protection under the influence of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and other factors. Methods: the method of formal logic, historical, comparative legal, systemic structural and formal dogmatic methods were used in course of the analysis. Results: international legal regulation does not provide clearly-defined guidelines to restrict the sphere of intellectual property. This factor undoubtedly contributes to expanding the list of its objects. At the beginning of the 21st century, law-based lists of copyrighted works did not include any new items. The institute of neighboring rights is most dynamically developing in the Law of the European Union. The Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market proposes recognizing two new neighboring rights. One of them is the right of the press publishers for online use of their publications by the news aggregators. The other neighboring right included into the draft Directive was the right to coverage of sporting events. However, in February, 2019, the provisions on this right were excluded from the Directive. In our opinion, biomedical cell products constitute new objects of civil circulation that require their own legal regulation as intellectual property constituents. Conclusions: intellectual property law cannot and should not undergo changes with the emergence of every new kind of objects. The contemporary challenge facing civil jurisprudence and the legislature is to formulate universal regulations that would make it possible to protect the rights of authors and developers of technological solutions even at the stage of experiments.
Keywords: intellectual property, object, work, neighboring rights, press-publication, sporting events, biomedical cell products, geographical indications, commercial designations.
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Bernhöft F., Kohler J. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law]. St. Petersburg, 1909. 407 p. (In Russ.).
2. Buzova N. V. Sokrovishcha Severa i intellektual'naya sobstvennost': diskussii i problemnye voprosy [Treasures of the North and Intellectual Property: Discussions and Issues]. Patenty i litsenzii. Intellektual'nye prava – Patents and Licenses. Intellectual Rights. 2018. Issue 6. Pp. 2–7. (In Russ.).
3. Gavrilov E. P., Eremenko V. I. Kommentariy k chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary on Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (article by article)]. Moscow, 2009. 978 p. (In Russ.).
4. Gavrilova E.B., Babakova T.S. Kharakteristika antitela kak tekhnicheskogo resheniya [Characterization of Antibody as a Technical Solution]. Patenty i litsenzii. Intellektual'nye prava – Patents and Licenses. Intellectual Rights. 2018. Issue 9. Pp. 22–29. (In Russ.).
5. Goldstone J. Pochemu Evropa? Vozvyshenie Zapada v mirovoy istorii, 1500–1850 [Why Europe? The Rise of the West in World History, 1500–1850]. Moscow, 2014. 302 p. (In Russ.).
6. Eremenko V. I. Naimenovaniya mest proiskhozhdeniya i geograficheskie ukazaniya: mezhdunarodno-pravovoy aspekt [Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications: International Legal Aspect]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika – Legislation and Economy. 2016. Issue 7. Pp. 58–70. (In Russ.).
7. Eremenko V.I. Firmennye naimenovaniya i kommercheskie oboznacheniya: mify i real'nost' [Trade Names and Commercial Designations: Myths and Reality]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika – Legislation and Economy. 2015. Issue 11. Pp. 7–15. (In Russ.).
8. Zaytsev Yu.V. Pravo na osveshchenie sportivnykh meropriyatiy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The Right to Cover Sporting Events in the Russian Federation]. Sport: ekonomika, pravo, upravlenie – Sport: Economy, Law, Management. 2010. Issue 4. Pp. 17–18. (In Russ.).
9. Intellektual'naya sobstvennost' v sovremennom mire / pod red. I. A. Bliznetsa [Intellectual Property in the Modern World; ed. by I. A. Bliznets]. Moscow, 2016. 896 p. (In Russ.).
10. Kantorovich Ya. A. Literaturnaya sobstvennost' [Literary Property]. St. Petersburg, 1895. 157 p. (In Russ.).
11. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast' chetvertaya / pod red. A. P. Sergeeva [Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Part Four; ed. by A. P. Sergeev]. Moscow, 2016. 913 p. (In Russ.).
12. Kommentariy k chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) / otv. red. E. A. Pavlova [Commentary on Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (article by article); ed. by E. A. Pavlova]. Moscow, 2018. 928 p. (In Russ.).
13. Kravchenko A.A. Pravovoy rezhim internet-sayta kak kompleksnogo ob"ekta prava intellektual'noy sobstvennosti: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [The Legal Regime of the Internet Site as a Complex Object of Intellectual Property Right: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2015. 214 p. (In Russ.).
14. Kuznetsova A. M. Grazhdansko-pravo-vaya okhrana rezul'tatov tvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti v sfere sporta v Rossii i zarubezhnykh stranakh: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Civil Law Protection of the Results of Creative Activity in the Field of Sports in Russia and Foreign Countries: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2013. 26 p. (In Russ.).
15. Kuptsova M. V., Badaeva T. N. Patenty na antitela: formula izobreteniya kak otrazhenie ego sushchnosti [Antibody Patents: the Claims as a Reflection of the Nature of the Invention]. Patenty i litsenzii. Intellektual'nye prava – Patents and Licenses. Intellectual Rights. 2019. Issue 2. Pp. 33–47. (In Russ.).
16. Lipszyc D. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava [Copyright and Neighboring Rights]. Moscow, 2002. 788 p. (In Russ.).
17. Matveev A. G. Krug smezhnykh prav v mezhdunarodnom prave i natsional'nykh pravovykh sistemakh [Neighboring Rights in International Law and National Legal Systems]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 4(38). Pp. 484–496. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-484-496.
18. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti: ucheb¬nik / pod obshch. red. L. A. Novoselovoy [Intel¬lectual Property Law: Textbook; ed. by L. A. No¬voselova]. Vol. 1. Obshchie polozheniya [Ge¬neral Provisions]. Moscow, 2017. 512 p. (In Russ.).
19. Ruzakova O. A., Grin' E. S. Voprosy razvitiya pravovogo regulirovaniya otnosheniy, ob"ektom kotorykh vystupayut geograficheskie ukazaniya [Legal Regulation of Relationships Pertaining to Geographical Indications]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2018. Issue 4(42). Pp. 685–699. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-42-685-699.
20. Salitskaya E.A. Nauchnoe otkrytie kak ob"ekt pravovoy okhrany [Scientific Discovery as an Object of Legal Protection]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2015. Issue 4. Pp. 54–82. (In Russ.).
21. Sergeeva N.Yu. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya kommercheskikh oboznacheniy [Problems of Legal Regulation of Commercial Designations]. Patenty i litsenzii. Intellektual'nye prava – Patents and Licenses. Intellectual Rights. 2018. Issue 12. Pp. 40–50. (In Russ.).
22. Sidjanski D., Castanos S. Mezhdunarodnaya okhrana avtorskogo prava [International Copyright Protection]. Moscow, 1958. 200 p. (In Russ.).
23. Sinel'nikova V. N. Chasti zhivoy prirody kak ob"ekty grazhdanskogo oborota: monografiya [Parts of Wildlife as Objects of Civil Circulation: Monograph]. Moscow, 2018. 159 p. (In Russ.).
24. Fabrichnyy S. Yu., Ruzakova O. A. Novelly zakonodatel'stva o promyshlennykh obraztsakh [Novels of Legislation on Industrial Designs]. Patenty i litsenzii. Intellektual'nye prava – Patents and Licenses. Intellectual Rights. 2019. Issue 2. Pp. 12–19. (In Russ.).
25. Fabrichnyy S. Yu., Ruzakova O. A. Novelly o geograficheskikh ukazaniyakh kak ob"ektakh intellektual'nykh prav [Novelties about the Geographical Indications as Intellectual Property Rights]. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiys¬koy Federatsii – Property Relations in the Russian Federation. 2018. Issue 12(207). Pp. 53–61. (In Russ.).
26. Huntington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy [The Clash of Civilizations]. Moscow, 2003. 603 p. (In Russ.).
27. Shwab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya [The Fourth Industrial Revolution]. Moscow, 2016. 208 p. (In Russ.).
28. Shershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava [Textbook of Russian Civil Law]. Moscow, 1914. Vol. 1. 483 p. (In Russ.).
29. Shishkin D. A. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'stva o naimenovaniyakh mest proiskhozhdeniya tovarov i geograficheskikh ukazaniyakh [Improving Legislation on Naming Place of Origin of Goods and Geographical Indication]. IS. Promyshlennaya sobstvennost' – Intellectual Property. Industrial Property. 2017. Issue 2. Pp. 32–38. (In Russ.).
30. Cabrera Blazquez F. J., Cappello M., Fontaine G., Valais S. Audiovisual Sports Rights – between Exclusivity and Right to Information. Strasbourg, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2016. 99 p. (In Eng.).
31. Colombet C. Major Principles of Copyright and Neighbouring Rights in the World. Paris: UNESCO, 1987. 139 p. (In Eng.).
32. Depoorter Ben. The Several Lives of Mickey Mouse: The Expanding Boundaries of Intellectual Property Law. Virginia Journal of Law and Technology. Spring 2004. Vol. 9. Issue 4. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=585829 (accessed 01.02.2019). (In Eng.).
33. Drahos P. The Universality of Intellectual Property Rights: Origins and Development. Intellectual Property and Human Rights. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization, 1999. Pp. 13–41. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/ edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_unhchr_ip_pnl_98/wipo_unhchr_ip_pnl_98_1.pdf (accessed 01.02.2019). (In Eng.).
34. Goldstein P. International Copyright: Principles, Law, and Practice. New York, 2001. 618 p. (In Eng.).
35. Hughes J. A Short History of Intellectual Property' in Relation to Copyright (July 11, 2009). Cardozo Law Review. 2012. Vol. 33. Issue 4. Pp. 1293–1340. Available at: https://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1432860 (accessed 01.02.2019). (In Eng.).
36. Koelman K. Copyright in the Courts: Perfume as Artistic Expression? WIPO Magazine. 2006. Issue 5. Pp. 2–3. (In Eng.).
37. Margoni T. The Protection of Sports Events in the EU: Property, Intellectual Property, Unfair Competition and Special Forms of Protection. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2016. Issue 47(4). Pp. 386–417. (In Eng.).
38. Ramos A., López L., Rodríguez A., Meng T., Abrams S. The Legal Status of Video Ga¬mes: Comparative Analysis in National Approaches. WIPO, 2013. Available at: https://www.wipo. int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_report_cr_vg.pdf (acces¬¬sed 01.02.2019). (In Eng.).
39. Reese R. Anthony. Copyrightable Subject Matter in the "Next Great Copyright Act". Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 2014. Vol. 29. Issue 3. Available at: https://scholar-ship.law.berke-ley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www. google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2060&context=btlj (accessed 01.02.2019). (In Eng.).
40. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005. 846 p. (In Eng.).
41. Samuelson P. Evolving Conceptions of Copyright Subject Matter. University of Pittsburgh Law Review. 2016. Vol. 78. Issue 1. Available at: https://lawreview.law.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/lawreview/article/view/427 (accessed 01.02.2019). (In Eng.).
42. Soares Marcelo, Kauffman Marcos. Industry 4.0: Horizontal Integration and Intellectual Property Law Strategies in England. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326237676_Industry_40_Horizontal_Integration_and_Intellectual_Property_Law_Strategies_In_England (accessed 01.02.2019). (In Eng.).
Received: 02.02.2019
Financing: ---
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year