Issue 1 (19) 2013

Smahtin_Larionova TO THE Parties' Reconciliation in Criminal Trial

TO THE Parties' Reconciliation in Criminal Trial

E.V. Smahtin

Tyumen State University

10, Semakova str., Tyumen, 625003

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

A.A. Larionova

Tyumen State University

10, Semakova str., Tyumen, 625003

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

The institute of reconciliation of the parties has high potential, it could become very effective way of permission of a conflict situation which results from commission of crime. Article is devoted to some problems of realization of institute of reconciliation of the parties in the Russian criminal trial. There are many disputable situations in practice because of absence of an accurate legislation regulation of procedure of reconciliation. Among them such as: a) whether on any criminal cases reconciliation of the parties is possible? b) whether reconciliation in case of death of the victim is possible? c) whether it is necessary to involve the person who has committed a crime, as accused? d) what termination of criminal cases is: the right or the obligation of the body (official), in whose production there is a criminal case, if they has the statement of the victim about reconciliation with the person who has committed a crime. Authors offer some ways of improvement of institute of reconciliation of the parties on the basis of generalization of a theoretical material and also studying of practice of the termination of criminal cases by vessels and law-enforcement bodies of the Tyumen region. For example, it is offered to limit possibility of application of the article 25 of the Criminal Procedure Code Russian Federation on cases of such crimes which encroach not only on private interests of the specific victim, but also on public interests. It is offered to forbid release of the person from criminal liability under article 25 of the Criminal Procedure Code Russian Federation in case of death of the victim, and also in cases when the person who has committed a crime, already participated in reconciliation of the parties. Authors offer criteria of appropriate registration of reconciliation of the parties. It is told about need of improvement of edition of the article 25 of the Criminal Procedure Code Russian Federation.

 Keywords: criminal trial; termination of criminal case; reconciliation of the parties

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Artemenko N.V., Min'kova A.M. Spornye voprosy primenenija normy ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti v svjazi s primireniem s poterpevshim // Ros. sud'ja. 2007. №6. S. 48–54.

2. Belousov V., Anastasov S. Realizacija poterpevshim prava na otkaz ot ugolovnogo presledovanija // Ugolovnyj process. 2007. №4. S. 75–78.

3. Vinogradova O.B. K voprosu o konkretizacii processual'nogo statusa uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri prekrashhenii ugolovnogo dela v svjazi s primireniem storon // Ros. sledovatel'. 2003. №3. S. 14–16.

4. Volkolup O.V. Sistema ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i problemy ee sovershenstvovanija. SPb.: Jurid. centr Press, 2003. 267 s.

5. Volodina L.M. Institut primirenija storon v ugolovnom processe // Vestnik TjumGU. 2000. №4. S. 206.

6. Voronin V.V. Vozmozhno li primirenie storon v sluchae gibeli poterpevshego? // Ugolovnyj process. 2007. №2. S. 52–54.

7. Voskanjan M. Primirenie storon portit statistiku pravoohranitelej // Advokat. gazeta. 2009. №9. S. 23–29.

8. Kuprijanov A.A. Osvobozhdenie ot otvetstvennosti za primireniem obvinjaemogo s poterpevshim po chasti 1 stat'i 318 UK RF // Ugolovnyj process. 2008. №4. S. 56–58.

9. Malysheva O.A. O kriterijah ocenki dejatel'nosti organov predvaritel'nogo rassledovanija // Problemy sovremennogo sostojanija i puti razvitija organov predvaritel'nogo sledstvija (k 15-letiju obrazovanija sledstvennogo apparata v Rossii): sb. materialov Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf.: v 3 ch. M.: Akad. upravlenija MVD Rossii, 2010. Ch. 1. S. 230–234.

10. Obzor sudebnoj praktiki prekrashhenija rajonnymi sudami Samarskoj oblasti ugolovnyh del v svjazi s primireniem s poterpevshim i dejatel'nym raskajaniem za 2008 god. URL: http://oblsud.sam.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=docum_sud&id=297 (data obrashhenija: 15.03.2011).

11. Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zaprosa Leninskogo rajonnogo suda goroda Mahachkaly o proverke konstitucionnosti stat'i 25 UPK RF [Jelektronnyj resurs]: opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 4 ijunja 2007 g. №519-O-O. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

12. O praktike naznachenija sudami Rossijskoj Federacii ugolovnogo nakazanija [Jelektronnyj resurs]: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 11 janv. 2007 g. №2 (red. ot 03.04.2008). Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

13. Churilov Ju.Ju. Ispol'zovanie primiritel'nyh procedur v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve vopreki interesam storon // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2009. №2. S. 40–42.

14. Shamardin A.A. Primirenie storon i otkaz ot podderzhanija obvinenija dolzhny utverzhdat'sja sudom // Ros. justicija. 2001. №2. S. 60–61.

15. Ugolovnoe delo №200520543\43. 64 l. // Arhiv GUVD po Tjumenskoj oblasti.

16. Ugolovnoe delo №200304049\19. 90 l. // Arhiv GUVD po Tjumenskoj oblasti.

17. Ugolovnoe delo №200203792\23. 55 l. // Arhiv GUVD po Tjumenskoj oblasti.

18. Ugolovnoe delo №1-152/2009. 173 l. // Arhiv Leninskogo rajonnogo suda g. Tjumeni.

19. Ugolovnoe delo №1-569/2008. 4 t. // Arhiv Leninskogo rajonnogo suda g. Tjumeni.

20. URL: http://www.rg.ru/2011/02/07/dtp-site.html (data obrashhenija 20.01.2009).