|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 4 (38) |
||||||||||
| Title: | FORMS OF PARENTAL LEGAL RELATIONS | |||||||||
| Authors: |
E. G. Komissarova, |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0003-4257-5673 | ResearcherID: | E-9302-2016 | |||||||
| Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.15.9.11540 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.24.01.13177 10.17072/1995-4190-2015-1-64-72 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-32-185-192 |
|||||||||
|
T. V. Krasnova, |
|
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | ||||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0002-3375-7443 | ResearcherID: | S-5442-2016 | |||||||
| Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-1-60-67 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-34-426-439 |
|||||||||
| T. V. Shershen, Perm State University |
|
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | ||||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0001-7158-3184 | ResearcherID: | H-4158-2016 | |||||||
| Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
| Requisites: | Komissarova E. G., Krasnova T. V., Shershen T. V. Yuridicheskie formy roditel'skogo otnosheniya [Forms of Parental Legal Relations]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 38. Pp. 521–534. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-521-534 | |||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-521-534 | |||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: when researching the problems of parental legal relations, scholars usually employ the general concept of legal relations. The connection between parental legal relations and a closer type of relations – family legal ones – is not studied. The reason lies in the insufficiently developed scientific doctrine about family legal relations. As a result, the provisions of the doctrine relating to some particular types of family and parental legal relations remain undeveloped as well. In family law rhetoric, their essence is often hidden behind the familiar but scientifically unclear word combination “parental rights and obligations”, which is often perceived as a mere formality necessary to form some judgments on its basis. Constituting the core of the so-called “parental right”, the legal essence of this word combination is nearly always reduced to the question of whom and how to oblige and force for the rights of the parent – child legal relations participants to be respected. Purpose: to lay the foundation for creation of the necessary theoretical groundwork for the problem of parental legal relations, taking into account the necessary theoretical and methodological premises. Methods: the research is based on general scientific methods (formal and dialectic logic, comparative law, interpretation) and the legal dogmatic method of cognition. Results: existence of a well-developed theory of family legal relations will allow for formation of the appropriate theoretical and methodological foundations for studying the theory of parental legal relations as their variety. In order to ensure progress in the development of scientific issues concerning parental legal relations, the authors propose to distinguish between rights in personam with obligations corresponding to them and absolute rights as perfect rights realization of which is not associated with assigning anybody to obligations. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | family legal relations; conceptual and methodological framework of science; forms of legal regulation; rights in personam; absolute rights; parental care | |||||||||
 |
download the full-version article |
|||||||||
| References: | 1. Braginskiy M. I. O meste grazhdanskogo prava v sisteme «pravo publichnoe – pravo chastnoe» [On the Place of Civil Law in the "Public Law – Private Law" System]. Problemy sovremennogo grazhdanskogo prava: Sbornik statey [Problems of Modern Civil Law: Collection of Articles]. Moscow, 2000. Pp. 74–76. (In Russ.). 2. Vorozheykin E. M. Aktual'nye problemy teorii semeynykh pravovykh otnosheniy v SSSR: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Current Problems of the Theory of Family Legal Relations in the USSR: Synopsis of Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 1973. 33 p. (In Russ.). 3. Dragomiretskaya K. Ya., Zabezhinskaya N. I., Kuzyatina V. E. et al. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. Sovetskoe semeynoe pravo. Bibliogra¬fiya. 1917–1960. [Soviet Civil Law. Soviet Family Law. Bibliography. 1917–1960]. Moscow, 1962. 664 p. (In Russ.). 4. Zubareva O. G. K voprosu o metodologii issledovaniya semeynykh pravootnosheniy [On the Issue of Methodology of Study of Family Legal Relations]. Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo – Family and Housing Law. 2015. Issue 4. Pp. 7–9. (In Russ.). 5. Ioffe O. S. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Soviet Civil Law]. Vol. 3. Leningrad, 1965. 347 p. (In Russ.). 6. Kommentariy k Kodeksu o brake i sem'ye RSFSR [Commentary to the Code on Marriage and Family of the RSFSR]. Moscow, 1982. 296 p. (In Russ.). 7. Kosenko E. V. Otdel'nye formy nauchnogo po¬znaniya semeynogo prava na primere issledo¬vaniya roditel'skogo pravootnosheniya [The Certain Forms of Scientific Knowledge of Family Rights through the Research of Parental Relations]. Metodologicheskie problemy tsivi-listicheskikh issledovaniy: sb. nauch. st.; otv. red. A. V. Gabov, V. G. Golubtsov, O. A. Kuzne¬tsova – Methodological Problems of the Civil Researches: Collection of Scientific Articles; ed. by A. V. Gabov, V. G. Golubtsov, O. A. Kuz¬netsova]. Issue 2. Moscow, 2017. Pp. 387–404 (In Russ.). 8. Levushkin A. N. Sistema semeynogo zakono-datel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii i drugikh gosudarstv-uchastnikov SNG: model' postroe¬niya i tendentsii razvitiya [The System of the Family Legislation of the Russian Federation and Other State-Participants of the CIS: Model of Construction and the Development Tendency]. Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo – Family and Housing Law. 2014. Issue 3. Pp. 29–32. (In Russ.). 9. Manankova R. P. Poyasnitel'naya zapiska k kontseptsii proekta novogo Semeynogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The Explanatory Note to the Conception of the Draft of the New RF Family Code]. Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo – Family and Housing Law. 2012. Issue 4. Pp. 26–41. (In Russ.). 10. Nechaeva A. M. Semeynoe pravo: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki [Family Law: Current Problems of Theory and Practice]. Moscow, 2007. 280 p. (In Russ.). 11. Nechaeva A. M. Zashchita lichnykh prav neso¬vershennoletnego grazhdanina v semeyno-pra¬vovoy sfere po Grazhdanskomu ulozheniyu Germanii [Defence of Personal Rights of Underage Citizen in Family Law Sphere According to Civil Code of Germany (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB)]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law. 2011. Issue 3. Pp. 86–94. (In Russ.). 12. Pergament A. I. Roditel'skie prava i obyazannosti (leninskie idei i novoe zakonodatel'stvo o brake i sem'e) [Parental Rights and Duties (Le¬ninist Ideas and New Legislation on Marriage and Family)]. Saratov, 1969. 420 p. (In Russ.). 13. Semeynoe pravo: Bibliograficheskiy ukazatel' dissertatsionnykh issledovaniy (1980–2005 gg.) i nauchnykh publikatsiy (1990–2005 gg.) [Fa¬mily Law: The Bibliographic Index of Dissertation Researches (1980–2005) and Scientific Publications (1990–2005)]. Kazan, 2007. 262 p. (In Russ.). 14. Sinitsyn S. A. Absolyutnye i otnositel'nye sub"ektivnye prava. Obshchee uchenie i problemy teorii grazhdanskogo prava. Sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie [Absolute and Relative Rights. General Doctrine and Problems of Theory of Civil Law. Comparative and Legal Research]. Moscow, 2015. 568 p. (In Russ.). 15. Stepanov S. A. Blesk i nishcheta pandektistiki. O traditsiyakh i netraditsiyakh russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. Vyp. 2 [Splendor and Misery of the Pandect Law. On Traditions and Non-Traditions of the Russian Civil Law]. Problemy teorii grazhdanskogo prava – Problems of Theory of Civil Law. Issue 2. Moscow, 2006. Pp. 146–153. (In Russ.). 16. Tarusina N. N. Rossiyskiy semeynyy zakon: mezhdu konstruktivnost'yu i neopredelennost'yu [Russian Family Law: Between Constructiveness and Uncertainty]. Yaroslavl, 2012. 234 p. (In Russ.). 17. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik; pod red. A. I. Koroleva, L. S. Yavicha [Theory of State and Law: Textbook; ed. by A. I. Koro-lev, L. S. Yavich]. Leningrad, 1987. 550 p. (In Russ.). 18. Tivodar S. I. Ontologiya semeynogo prava: avto¬ref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [The Ontology of the Family Law: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2000. 23 p. (In Russ.). 19. Chervyakov K. K. Osnovaniya vozniknoveniya i prekrashcheniya roditel'skikh pravootnosheniy po sovetskomu semeynomu pravu: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [The Bases of Creation and Termination of Parental Legal Relationship According to the Soviet Family Law: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Saratov, 1971. 18 p. (In Russ.). 20. Chernus' N. Yu. Listaya stranitsy nauchnogo zhurnala: istoriografiya semeynogo prava (1927–2010 gg.) [Looking Through Scientific Magazine: Historiography of Family Law (1927–2010)]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya «Pravo» – Vestnik NSU. Series: Law. 2011. Vol. 7. Issue 2. Pp. 88–91. (In Russ.). 21. Shakhova E. S. K voprosu o roditel'skom pravootnoshenii v teorii prava [On the Question of Legal Relationships in the Theory of Parental Rights]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya istoriya i pravo – Proceedings of the Southwest State University. History and Law. 2015. Issue 2(15). Pp. 14–19. (In Russ.). 22. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava [Textbook of the Russian Civil Law]. Part 2. Moscow, 2005. 462 p. (In Russ.). 23. Yavich L. S. Obshchaya teoriya prava [The General Theory of Law]. Leningrad, 1976. 285 p. (In Russ.). 24. Bainham A. Is Anything Now Left of Parental Rights? Responsible Parents and Parental Responsibility. Ed. by Rebecca Probert, Stephen Gilmore, Jonathan Herring. Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2009. Pp. 23–42. (In Eng.). 25. Barrata R. The Process of Characterization in the EC Conflict of Laws: Suggesting a Flexible Approach. Yearbook of Private International Law. Vol. VI – 2004. Ed. by P. Sarcevic, P. Volken, A. Bonomi. Sellier European Law Publishers, 2005. Pp. 155–170. (In Eng.). 26. Belohlávek A. J. Rome Convention – Rome I Regulation. Juris Publishing, Inc., 2011. 3086 p. (In Eng.). 27. Broomley's Family Law. Ed. by Nigel Lowe, Gillian Douglas. Oxford University Press, 2015. 1127 p. (In Eng.). 28. Das Grundgesetz (GG) ist die Verfassung für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Available at: http://www.bundestag.de/parlament/aufgaben/ rechtsgrundlagen/grundgesetz/gg_01/245122 (accessed 27.07.2017). (In Germ.). 29. European Family Law in Action: Parental Responsibilities. III, Vol. 3. Ed. by K. Boele-Woelki, B. Braat, I. Curry-Sumner. Intersentia NV, 2005. 821 p. (In Eng.). 30. Gerhardt W. Absolute und relative Unwirksamkeit als rechtliches Steuerungsinstrument. Festschrift fuer W. Flueme zum 70. Koeln, 1978. Pp. 527–531. (In Germ.). 31. Gilmore St., Glennon L. Hayes and Williams' Family Law. Oxford University Press, 2015. 864 p. (In Eng.). 32. Harris-Short S., Miles J., George R. Family Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Gosport, 2015. 1144 p. (In Eng.). 33. Kelly W. D. Family Law. Frederick (MD), 2008. (In Eng.). 34. Linde R. The Globalization of Childhood: the International Diffusion of Norms and Law against the Child Death Penalty. European Journal of International Relations. 2014. No. (20)2. Pp. 544–568. (In Eng.). 35. Parquet M. Droit de la famille. Editions Bréal, 2007. 202 p. (In Fren.). 36. Practice Guide for the Application of the Brussels IIa Regulation. Available at: http://ec. europa.eu/justice/civil/files/brussels_ii_practice_ guide_en.pdf (accessed 27.07.2017). (In Eng.). 37. Schellhammer K. Familienrecht nach Anspruchsgrundlagen: samt Verfahren in Familien-, Kindschafts- und Betreuungssachen. C. F. Müller GmbH, 2006. 797 p. (In Germ.). 38. Scherpe J. M. Establishing and Ending Parental Responsibility: A Comparative View. Responsible Parents and Parental Responsibility. Ed. by Rebecca Probert, Stephen Gilmore, Jonathan Herring. Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2009. Pp. 43–62. (In Eng.). 39. Vasak K. Pour une troisieme generation des droits de l'homme. Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles. Ed. by C. Swinarski. Hague. 1984. Pp. 837–845. (In Eng.). 40. Wendel K. Das Recht zur elterlichen Sorge als absolutes Recht i. S. des § 823 Abs. 1 BGB. Available at: http://www.neue-justiz.nomos.de/ fileadmin/neue-justiz/doc/2015/Aufsatz_NJ_15_ 06.pdf (accessed 27.07.2017). (In Germ.). 41. Westermann H., Westermann H. P., Gur-sky K. H., Eickmann D. Sachenrecht. Heidelberg, 2011. 1079 p. (In Germ.). 42. Zorn D. Das Recht der elterlichen Sorge: Voraussetzungen, Inhalt und Schranken. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2015. 408 p. (In Germ.). |
|||||||||
| Financing: | --- | |||||||||
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year