|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 4 (38) |
||||||||||
| Title: | THE STAGE DIRECTOR AS A SUBJECT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: PROBLEMS OF THE STATUS DETERMINATION | |||||||||
| Authors: |
N. S. Mikhailova, |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-002-3907-0183 | ResearcherID: | 0-5808-2017 | |||||||
| Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
|
Yu. I. Vakhitova, |
|
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | ||||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0002-5022-0402 | ResearcherID: | O-4175-2016 | |||||||
| Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2015-2-41-48 | |||||||||
| Requisites: | Mikhailova N. S., Vakhitova Yu. I. Rezhisser-postanovshchik kak sub"ekt intellektual'nykh prav: problemy opredeleniya statusa [The Stage Director as a Subject of Intellectual Property Rights: Problems of the Status Determination] Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 38. Pp. 497–507. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-497-507 | |||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-497-507 | |||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: the article is aimed at the analysis of reputable and qualified public members involvement in the sphere of criminal proceedings and in the resolution of criminal conflicts through mediation under control of the court in foreign countries, especially those with the Anglo-Saxon law system. In the United States and other common law countries, restorative justice has demonstrated some good results. Restorative justice considers an offence not only as violation of the law, but primarily the victim’s rights violation. It also sees it as a wrongdoing, stating that the offence was committed not so much against public order and the State, but as trespass to the person. Restorative justice is aimed not only at punishing the offender and compensating for damages caused to the victim, but also, to a certain extent, at the offender’s correction. It is generally recognized that incarceration does not correct the accused, and it can aggravate the vices of the individual in many cases. Restorative justice is able to avoid such issues. Not accidentally, the application of restorative justice programs, including these in the criminal process, is recommended by a number of international legal norms, especially in resolution of criminal cases against minors. In our country, the attitude to juvenile justice is ambiguous. However, this circumstance does not give the grounds to ignore the practice of the USA and other countries and gradually implement the elements of restorative justice that are acceptable to our criminal procedure. Purpose: to analyze the formation of the restorative justice paradigm, as well as the current practice of restorative justice programs in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal system, to identify some positive practices and substantiate the proposals for the consolidation of restorative justice programs in criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. Methods: there were used the dialectical, historical, comparative legal, system-structural, and logical-legal methods. Results: It is concluded that there is necessity for legislative consolidation of the possibility of the restorative justice programs use in criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. It is proposed to introduce relevant amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | stage director; theatrical performance; audiovisual work; result of intellectual activity; performance; object of copyright; single creative concept; a complex object | |||||||||
 |
download the full-version article |
|||||||||
| References: | Antimonov B. S., Fleyshits E. A. Avtorskoe pravo [Сopyright]. 1957. 280 p. (In Russ.). 2. Bliznets I. A., Leont'ev K. B. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava: uchebnik; pod red. I. A. Bliz¬netsa [Сopyright and Neighboring Rights; ed. by I. A. Bliznets]. 2011. 416 p. (In Russ.). 3. Gavrilov E. P. Kommentariy k zakonu ob avtor¬skom i smezhnykh pravakh [Commentary on the Law of Copyright and Neighboring Rights]. 2003. 212 p. (In Russ.). 4. Gavrilov E. P., Eremenko V. I. Kommentariy k chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary on Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Article by Article)]. Access from the legal reference system ConsultantPlus. (In Russ.). 5. Gordon M. V. Sovetskoe avtorskoe pravo [Soviet Copyright Law]. 1955. 232 p. (In Russ.). Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik; pod red. A. P. Sergeeva, Yu. K. Tolstogo [Сivil Law. Textbook; ed. by A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tol¬stoy]. Vol. 3. 2011. 798 p. (In Russ.). 6. Grishaev S. P. Smezhnye prava [Neighboring Rights]. Access from the legal reference system ConsultantPlus (In Russ.). 8. Dozortsev V. A Intellektual'nye prava. Ponyatie. Sistema. Zadachi kodifikatsii. Sbornik statey [Intellectual Property Rights. Concept. System. Problems of Codification: Collection of Articles]. 2003. 416 p. (In Russ.). 9. Eremenko V. I. O pravovoy okhrane smezhnykh prav v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [On the Legal Protection of Neighboring Rights in the Russian Federation]. Zakonodatelstvo i ekonomika – Law and Economics. 2012. No. 2. Pp. 30–55. (In Russ.). 10. Ionas V. Ya. Proizvedeniya tvorchestva v grazhdanskom prave [Works of Art in Civil Law]. 1972. 168 p. (In Russ.). 11. Istoriya russkogo dramaticheskogo teatra; pod red. Yu. A. Dmitrieva, T. M. Rodinoy, O. M. Fel'dman i dr. [History of Russian Drama Theatre; ed. by Yu. A. Dmitriev, T. M. Rodina, O. M. Fel'dman et al.]. Vol. 2. 556 p. (In Russ.). 12. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (uchebno-prakticheskiy, po¬stateynyy); pod red. S. A. Stepanova [Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Article by Article); ed. by S. A. Ste¬panov]. Parts One, Two, Three and Four. Ekaterinburg, 2009. 1504 p. (In Russ.). 13. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii chasti chetvertoy (posta¬teynyy); otv. red. L. A. Trakhtengerts [Commentary on Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Article by Article); ed. by L. A. Trakhtengerts]. 2009. 897 p. (In Russ.). 14. Korchagina N. P., Morgunova E. A., Pogulyaev V. V. Kommentariy k chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy); pod red. V. V. Pogulyaeva. [Commentary on Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Article by Article)]. Access from the legal reference system ConsultantPlus. (In Russ.). 15. Kotenko E. S. Avtorskie prava na mul'ti-mediynyy produkt [Copyright to Multimedia Products]. Moscow, 2013. 124 p. (In Russ.). 16. Liptsik D. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava [Copyright and Neighboring Rights]. 2002. 257 p. (In Russ.). 17. Sergeev A. P. Intellektual'naya sobstvennost' [Intellectual Property]. 2000. 400 p. (In Russ.). 18. Serebrovskiy V. I. Voprosy sovetskogo avtor-skogo prava [Issues of Soviet Copyright]. 1956. 283 p. (In Russ.). |
|||||||||
| Financing: | --- | |||||||||
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year