FORMAL LOGICAL ASPECTS OF "THE LEGAL NATURE" CONCEPTION

E.G. Komissarova

Perm State National Research University
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

In an effort to delineate the concept of "legal nature" of related concepts, the author analyzes its essential direction, identifying the most significant characteristics of the concept. Commonly used usability and versatility of this category of cases where it can be employed, usually overshadow the question of the essence of this concept, and hence the adequacy of the scientific circulation, giving it the character of the "revolving chancery" is used in all cases when there are difficulties in choosing the "name" of a scientific question. Following the goal, stated in the name of the article, the author investigated the concept relates to such a "legal regime", "law-making features of the legal phenomenon," "legal description", where the legal description of the phenomenon of a "slice" the legal nature of the phenomenon, and the legal regime of the perceived as a synonym for the legal entity.

The need to study this relationship is predetermined by the multi-turn the concept of "legal nature", the complexity of its internal filling and a composite character. The scope and geography of the branch using the term very significant, and substance in relation to which it is used widely. But this, in my opinion, does not exclude the possibility to find and see the limits of its use in the scientific revolution. Although it is not easy because of the existence of this concept only speculative level and versatility of his habitual perception. The phenomenological analysis of this combination allows us to see that this is a deep, intrinsic characteristics of the legal phenomenon, or rather, that his legal roots. This is due to the fact that in analyzing the terminological meaning of "legal nature" of decisive importance is the presence in it of the term "legal", indicating that the phenomenon is defined in terms of law. Hence the existence of a legal nature in a particular legal phenomenon is an axiom. Another thing is that this nature as the cause of the phenomenon in the law, it is necessary to identify, justify, based on evolutionary and cash signs legal phenomenon, which in concentrated form, and give an idea of the legal nature of the phenomenon.

Keywords: legal nature; legal status; law; legal description; chancery in the law; branch of law; legal description; regulatory signs; the essential properties of the legal phenomenon

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Alekseev S.S. Obwie dozvolenija i zaprety v sovetskom prave. M.: Juridicheskaja literatura, 1998. S. 227.

2. Alekseev S.S. Teorija prava. M.: BEK, 1994. S. 172.

3. Antokol'skaja M.V. Semejnoe pravo. M.: Jurist#, 2002. S. 156.

4. Bondov S.N. Brachnyj dogovor. M., 2002. S. 56;

5. Gegel' G.V.F. Nauka logiki. M., 1971. T.2. S. 70.

6. Gongalo B.M., Krasheninnikov P.V. Brach¬nyj dogovor: komment. semejnogo i grazhd. zakonodatel'stva. M.: Statut, 2004. S. 8–9.

7. Dal' V.I. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo jazyka. Sovremennaja versija. M., 2002. S. 530.

8. Zaharov V.A. Sozdanie juridicheskih lic: pravovye voprosy. M.: Norma, 2002. S. 52.

9. Ivlev Ju.V. Logika dlja juristov: uchebnik dlja vuzov. M.: Delo, 2000. S. 133.

10. Korolev Ju.A. Brachnyj kontrakt // Zakon. 2004. Apr.

11. Maksimovich L.B. Brachnyj dogovor v rossijskom prave. M.: Os'-89, 2003. S. 8.

12. Mal'ko A.V. Teorija gosudarstva i prava v voprosah i otvetah: ucheb.-metod. posobie. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Jurist#, 2002. S. 265.

13. Matveev I.V. Pravovaja priroda nedejstvitel'nyh sdelok. M.: Jurditinform, 2004. S. 5.

14. Obwaja teorija prava: uchebnik dlja jurid. vuzov / Ju.A. Dmitriev, I.F. Kaz'min, V.V. Lazarev i dr.; pod obw. red. A.S. Pigolkina. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Izd-vo MGTU im. N.Je. Baumana, 1995. S. 99.

15. Pchelinceva L.M. Semejnoe pravo Rossii. M.: Norma, 2004. S. 206.

16. Reutov S.I. Prakticheskie voprosy zakljuchenija brachnogo dogovora // Notarius. 2003. №5.

17. Senchiwev V.I. Ob#ekt grazhdanskogo pravootnoshenija // Aktual'nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava / pod red. M.I. Braginskogo. M.: Statut, 1999. S. 140.

18. Slepakova A.V. Pravootnoshenija sobstvennosti suprugov. M., 2005. S. 275.

19. URL: http://www.profgarant.ru/stati/stat1.

20. Teorija gosudarstva i prava: kurs lekcij / pod red. N.I. Matuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. 2–e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Jurist#, 2000. S. 547.

21. Trubeckoj E.I. Trudy po filosofii prava / vstup. st., sost. i primech. I.I. Evlampieva. SPB.: Izd-vo RHGI, 2001. S. 519–520.

22. Filosofija prirody v Antichnosti i v srednie veka / Obw. red. P.P. Gajdenko, V.V. Petrov. M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2000. S. 441.

23. Cyplenkova A.V. Pravovaja priroda dogovorov prisoedinenija // Juridicheskij mir. 2002. №4. S. 38–48.

24. Sheludjakov P.M. O pravovoj prirode sdelki kak kategorii mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava // Bjul. notar. praktiki. 2004. №3. S. 27–31.