LEGAL SELF-EDUCATION AS INDEPENDENT TYPE
of SUBJECT-SUBJECT LEGAL SOCIALIZATION

A.S. Bondarev

Perm State National Research University
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Codes of public conduct (legal including) biologically in a man are not stopped up. Sociologists consider that more than 80% of human behavior socially to them purchased прижизненно in the process of the socialization. Legal socialization as part of general socialization in democratic society, in our view, must carry subject-subject character only. And then in her it must exist not two, and three types(directions) of legal socialization – one elemental and two organized purposeful. 1). Elemental – she consists of that a legal subject forms the legal culture in the process of the disorderly co-operating with a legal culture and her objects process of life. 2). Organized purposeful – through legal education of legal subjects. 3). Organized purposeful – through a legal self-education.

A legal self-education is first examined as the independent organized and purposeful direction(kind) of legal socialization is in modern democratic society. His concept is given.

His structure opens up in detail – maintenance of every part of independent (autonomous) process of legal self-education of legal subjects is analysed and their role is determined in a structure. The aim of legal self-education and her value are certain in a management by this process. Three crisis points of his necessary intensification are indicated.

Drawn conclusion: by virtue of complication of autonomous process of legal self-education The authors.

 Keywords: legal socialization; legal education; legal self-education; stages legal self-education; methods of legal self-educationindependently in him capable to the ss

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Stepanova. M.: Mysl', 2001. URL: http://dic.academic.rudic.nsf/enc_philosophy/4631/ OPREDMEChIVANIE/ p.5 of 7

2. Bondarev A.S. Pravovaja kul'tura – faktor zhizni prava. M., 2012.

3. Kovalev. A.G. Lichnost' vospityvaet sebja. M.: Politizdat, 1983.

4. Opredmechivanie i raspredmechivanie // Bol'shoj tolkovyj slovar' po kul'turologi. M., 2003. URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ene_culture/ 2048 p.1 of 1.

5. Kravchenko A.I. Sociologija. Obshhij kurs. M.: Logos, 2000.

6. Krys'ko V.G. Social'naja psihologija: slovar'-spravochnik. Minsk: Harvest, 2004.

7. Mardahaev L.V. Social'naja pedagogika. M.: Gardariki, 2005. 269 s.

8. Pravovoe vospitanie v Rossijskoj Federacii // Vse o prave – inform.-obrazovat. jurid. portal Wallpravo.

9. // Psiholog. jencikl. URL: http://enc-dic.com

10. // Jencikl. prakt. psihologii. URL: http://www.psycologos.ru

11. i samosovershenstvovanie lichnosti. URL: http://kbsu.ru/pd/did lec 9. html P.13 of 20.

12. Slastenin V.A. Samovospitenie v strukture processa formirovanija lichnosti // Nikliah 2009. 25 nojab.

13. Smetanin E.A. Adaptacija naselenija k sovremennoj jekonomicheskoj situacii // Sociol. issled. 1995. №4.

14. Smirnov V.I. Obshhaja pedagogika. M.: Logos,1999.

15. Stoljarenko A.M. Juridicheskaja pedagogika. M.: Jekmos,2000. 496 s.

16. Filosofskaja jenciklopedija. M., 1967. S. 154.