Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022. Issue 1 (55)


T. N. Neshataeva, Russian State University of Justice

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-5159-596X 
ResearcherID: ABI-2923-2020 
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       DOI: 10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-3-134-154 
Requisites: Neshataeva T. N. Nezavisimost' i dobrosovestnost' suda i sudey v tsifrovuyu epokhu: integratsionnyy opyt
[Independence and Good Faith of the Court and Judges in the Digital Age: an Integration Experience]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022. Issue 55. Pp. 107–126. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-55-107-126
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-55-107-126

Introduction: the article is devoted to the problems of judicial independence and standards of judicial conduct. Purpose: to analyze the independence of judges tracing its procedural and judicial development through the example of the activities of the Court of the EAEU, as well as in the light of the emergence of new virtual forms of influence on judges and their independence. Methods: general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization, comparative legal method, cultural-historical approach. Results: the EAEU has already established international integration management bodies; however, violation of procedural regulations (or their absence) generates unacceptable dishonesty in the implementation of norms. A conflict that slows down the integration can arise not only directly in the economic turnover but can also be artificially created by a bad faith influence on the court from the public, for example, in a digital environment. This happens in case of violation of standards of international service such as competence, objectivity, conflict of interest, and good faith. Pressure to change a judicial act is a particularly dangerous form of violation of these standards. Conclusions: it is necessary to improve the procedural formalization of the activities of the EAEU bodies: the methods of voting on economic issues in supranational bodies should be changed, as well as the structure of the Court of the EAEU. Changes are also required in the mechanism of execution of the Court’s judgments. Publicity as well as stricter mechanisms for appointing judges, including those of an international court, can serve as a serious antidote to bad faith actions in a virtual environment.

Keywords: international and national law; Eurasian integration; Court of the EAEU; international justice; forms of influence on the court; standards of conduct for international officials; judicial activity principles; independence of the court; good faith
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Voynikov V. V., Entina E. G., Entin M. L. Perspektivy, potrebnosti i podvodnye kamni konstitutsionalizatsii ES i EAES [Prospects, Needs, and Pitfalls of Constitutionalization of the EU and the EAEU]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. Issue 4. Pp. 89–103. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.04.07. (In Russ.)
2. Volkov A. V. Printsip nedopustimosti zlo¬upot¬rebleniya grazhdanskimi pravami v zakonodatel'stve i sudebnoy praktike [The Principle of Inadmissibility of Abuse of Civil Rights in Legislation and Judicial Practice]. Moscow, 2010. 960 p. (In Russ.).
3. Vol'fson V. L. Nedobrosovestnost' kak dia¬g¬noz zloupotrebleniya sub''ektivnym grazhdanskim pravom [Bad Faith as a Diagnosis of Abuse of a Civil Right]. Moscow, 2019. 80 p. DOI: 10.31085/9785392296798-2019-80. (In Russ.).
4. Johnson B. S mechtoy o Rime [The Dream of Rome]. Moscow, 2017. 272 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kommentariy k Bangalorskim printsipam povedeniya sudey [Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct]. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Available at: _of_judicial_con¬duct/ban¬galore_prin-ciples_rus¬sian.pdf. (In Russ.).
6. Larina A. «V kriticheskie periody nesvoboda rozhdaet terror». Andrey Sakharov o tom, kak zashhishhat' prava cheloveka v strane, gde ikh ne soblyudayut ['In Critical Periods, Lack of Freedom Gives Rise to Terror'. Andrei Sakharov on How to Protect Human Rights in a Country Where They Are Not Respected]. Kommersant Weekend. May 21, 2021. Issue 16. P. 6. (In Russ.).
7. Malinovskiy A. A. Zloupotreblenie sub"ek¬tivnym pravom (teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie) [Abuse of a Right (Theoretical and Legal Research)]. Moscow, 2007. 352 p. (In Russ.).
8. Neshataeva T. N. Sud i pravo: evraziyskaya integratsiya [The Court and Law: Eura¬sian Integration]. Moscow, 2021. 336 p. (In Russ.).
9. Neshataeva T. N. Zashhita grazhdanskikh prav i sudoustroystvo v evraziyskom kontekste [Civil Rights Protection and the Judicial System in the Eurasian Context]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii – Herald of Economic Justice. 2021. Issue 10. Pp. 82–98. (In Russ.).
10. Porotikova O. A. Problema zloupotreb-leniya sub"ektivnym grazhdanskim pravom [The Problem of Abuse of a Civil Right]. Moscow, 2021. 241 p. (In Russ.).
11. Prodi P. Istoriya spravedlivosti: ot plyuralizma forumov k sovremennomu dualizmu sovesti i prava [A History of Justice: From the Plu¬ra¬lism of Forums to the Modern Dualism of Con¬science and Law]. Moscow, 2017. 512 p. (In Russ.).
12. Sinchenkova A. Vyigrat' nel'zya pro¬ig-rat': perspektivy sudebnogo PR [Win Not Lose: Prospects for Judicial PR]. Available at: (In Russ.).
13. Shugrina E. S. Kontrol' za deyatel'-nost'yu i otvetstvennost' vlasti: zloupotreblenie pravom, zloupotreblenie vlast'yu ili ignorirovanie prava? [Control over the Activities and Responsibility of the Authorities: Abuse of the Right, Abuse of Power, or Disregard of the Right?]. Munitsipal'¬naya sluzhba – Municipal Service. 2012. Issue 3. Pp. 20–30. (In Russ.).
14. Entin K. V. Rol' mezhdunarodnykh dogo¬vo¬rov i mezhdunarodnogo obychnogo prava v pravoporyadke ES i EAES [The Role of Inter¬national Agreements and International Customary Law in the EU and EAEU Legal Orders]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie – International Justice. 2021. Is¬sue 1. Pp. 102–130. DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2021-1-102-130. (In Russ.).
15. Eticheskie normy povedeniya sudey: Kurs samopodgotovki [Judicial Conduct and Ethics: Self-Directed Course]. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Vienna, 2019. Available at: (In Russ.).
16. Yablochkov T. M. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava [Course on International Civil Procedure Law]. Zolotoy fond rossiyskoy nauki mezhdunarodnogo prava [Gold Fund of the Russian Science of International Law]. Vol. II. Moscow, 2009. Pp. 329–460. (In Russ.).
17. Amerasinghe C. F. Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2005. XXXIV, 535 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614224. (In Eng.).
18. Chalmers D., Davies G., Monti G. European Union Law. Cases and Materials. Cambridge UP, 2010. XCI, 1116 p. (In Eng.).
19. Cheng B. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. London: Stevens and Sons Limited, 1953. LI, 490 p. (In Eng.).
20. De Cruz P. Comparative Law in a Changing World. London, Sydney: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1999. XX, 512 p. (In Eng.).
21. Jodoin S. Understanding the Behaviour of International Courts. An Examination of Decision-Making at the ad hoc International Criminal Tri¬bu¬nals. Journal of International Law and Inter¬nation¬nal Relations. 2010. Vol. 6. Issue 1. Рp. 1–34. (In Eng.).
22. Kischel U. Rechtsvergleichung. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2015. XXXII, 1010 p. (In Germ.).
23. Lenaerts K., Van Nuffel P. Constitutional Law of the European Union. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2005. CLII, 969 p. (In Eng.).
24. Lindberg L. The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1963. XIV, 367 p. (In Eng.).
25. Møse E. The Independence of Inter-national Judges. The Independence of Judges; ed. by N. A. Engstad, A. Lærdal Frøseth, B. Tønder. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2014. Pp. 187–205. (In Eng.).
26. Mukhametdinov M. The Eurasian Economic Union and Integration Theory. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. XII, 209 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34288-3. (In Eng.).
27. Pollack M. A. The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford, 2003. 512 p. DOI: 10.1093/ 0199251177.001.0001. (In Eng.).
28. Schermers H. G., Blokker N. M. International Institutional Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011. XXXVI, 1273 p. (In Eng.).
29. Shany Y. No Longer a Weak Department of Power? Reflections on the Emergence of a New International Judiciary. European Journal of International Law. 2009. Issue 1. Рp. 73–91. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chn081. (In Eng.).
30. Shaw M. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2017. LXXXVIII, 1033 p. DOI: 10.1017/9781316979815. (In Eng.).
31. Thiemeyer G. Supranationalität als Novum in der Geschichte der internationalen Politik der fünfziger Jahre. Journal of European Integration History. 1998. Vol. 4. Issue 2. Pp. 5–21. (In Germ.).
32. Vinokurov E. Introduction to the Eurasian Economic Union. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. XXIII, 211 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92825-8. (In Eng.).
Received: 16.12.2021


The Perm State University
614990, Perm, street Bukireva, 15
+7 (342) 2 396 275
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year