Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2018. Issue 1 (39)

Title: MODERN MODELS OF PRIVATE LAW RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP TO LANDED ESTATE
Authors:

I. A. Emelkina,
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-0071-0163 ResearcherID: W-2836-2017
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»:       ---
Requisites: Emelkina I. A. Sovremennye modeli chastnopravovykh ogranicheniy prava sobstvennosti na zemel’nuyu nedvizhimost’ [Modern Models of Private Law Restrictions on the Right of Ownership to Landed Estate]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2018. Issue 39. Pp. 74–98. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-39-74-98
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-39-74-98
Annotation:

Introduction: the article considers various legal models of private law restrictions on the ownership of land. In the context of the formation of a single civil law institute of neighbor law, it is necessary to form a model of private law restrictions on property rights corresponding to modern social and economic relations. In different legal systems, their own legislative models of neighbor law have been developed. With the introduction of new technologies, modern types of industrial production, development of opportunities for using space over private real estate for various purposes, there appear new concepts of neighbor law. In this regard, the study of a set of theoretical and legal issues concerning neighbor law is of considerable significance.
Purpose: to develop an understanding of the legal models of private law restrictions on the right of ownership to real estate in European countries and the United States, based on the analysis of scientific sources, various legal doctrines, laws of individual countries, as well as judicial practice. The leading method to investigate this problem is the comparative legal one, which allows us to comprehensively consider the legal institutions of neighbor law in different countries and to identify the most general patterns of the development. Along with the comparative legal method, we also used the methods of objectivity, from the abstract to the concrete and from the concrete to the abstract, empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation, theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Results: the principles on which restriction on property rights in foreign legal systems is based are presented, the model of neighbor law proposed for implementation in the 19th century is shown, various theoretical models of neighbor law in domestic and foreign law are analyzed, the author’s model recommended for application to improve legislation on the ownership of real estate is presented. Conclusions: the paper justifies differences in the approaches of American and European law in the formation of restrictions on property rights, and also the absence of grounds for the dominance in the countries of the post-Soviet space of the American model of restrictions on the ownership of private property. The paper substantiates the criteria for the differentiation between public and private law regulation of neighborly relations, the dominance of the norms of civil law in neighbor law, the possibility of changing legal restrictions on property rights in the interests of a neighbor by an agreement establishing the real right of a servitude type, grounds for referring to the right of the necessary road in the German legal order. The materials of the article are of practical value in determining the legal policy for the development of legislation on restrictions on the right of ownership to land in the interests of neighbors in the context of the reform of Russian civil law.

Keywords: real estate; land; land surveying; ownership; property rights; neighbor law; neighbor; servitude; development; land boundaries; land cadaster; landowner; restrictions; rights of neighbors; real right; divided property
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Bagaev V. Obshchemu imushchestvu ishchut osobuyu sud'bu. Zakonoproekty o sadovodstve i o prodazhe dolevoy sobstvennosti ne pod¬derzhany Sovetom po kodifikatsii [They Seek a Special Destiny for Common Property. Bills on Gardening and Sale of Common Property are not Supported by the Council for Codification]. Available at: http:// zakon.ru (accessed 13.01.2017). (In Russ.).
2. Bocharov M.V . Proekt Grazhdanskogo kodek¬sa: oborot nedvizhimosti v opasnosti [Draft of the Civil Code: Real Estate Sales in Risk]. Yurist ‒ Jurist. 2012. Issue 10. Pp. 21‒28. (In Russ).
3. Vinichenko Yu. V., Aslanyan N. P., Porotiko-va .A. Sosedskoe pravo v Rossii: istoricheskie nachala i podkhody k ponimaniyu [Neighbor Law in Russia: Historical Origins and Ap¬proaches to Understanding]. Moscow, 2014. 152 p. (In Russ.).
4. Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie. Kniga tret'ya. Votc¬hinnoe pravo. Proekt Vysochayshe utverzh¬dennoy Redaktsionnoy Komissii po sostavleniyu Grazhdanskogo Ulozheniya. S ob"yasneniyami [The Civil Code. The Third Book. Patrimonial Right. The Project of the Drafting Committee on Drafting the Civil Code by Imperial Consolidation. With Explanations]. St. Peters¬burg, 1902. 630 р. (In Russ.).
5. El'yashevich V. B. Pravo uchastiya chastnogo i ego zashchita [The Right of Private to Par¬ticipation and Its Defense]. Vestnik grazhdan¬skogo prava ‒ Civil Law Review. 1914. Issue 2. Pp. 18‒35. (In Russ.).
6. Emelkina I. A. Institut ogranicheniya prava sobstvennosti v pol'zu sosedey (sosedskoe pravo) v rossiyskom prave i v prave otdel'nykh evropeyskikh stran [Restrictions of Ownership Title in Favor of Neighbors (Neighbors' Rights) in Russian Law and in Law of European Countries]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava ‒ Civil Law Review. 2016. Issue 2. Pp. 79‒112. (In Russ.).
7. Zhivov A. A. O sosedskom prave i predial'nykh servitutakh [Law of Neighboring Tenements and Easements]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava ‒ History of State and Law. 2012. Issue 2. Pp. 21‒24. (In Russ.).
8. Kontseptsiya razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakono¬datel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, odobrena Sovetom po kodifikatsii grazhdanskogo zakono¬datel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii 7 oktyabrya 2009 goda [The Concept of Development of Civil Legislation of the Russian Federation, Ap¬proved by the Council for Codification of Civil Legislation of the Russian Federation under the President of the Russian Federation on October 7, 2009]. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii – Herald of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation. 2009. Issue 11. Pp. 6‒99. (In Russ.).
9. Korolev S. V. Ekologicheskiy imperativ sine qua non tsivilistiki XXI v. [Environmental Im¬perative Sine Qua Non of Civil Jurisprudence of the 21st Century]. Ekologicheskoe pravo ‒ Environmental Law. 2010. Issue 2. Pp. 33‒36. (In Russ.).
10. Krasnova T. S. Prinuditel'nost' i avtonomiya voli v servitutnom prave: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Compulsoriness and Autonomy of Will in Servitude Law: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2017. 263 p. (In Russ.).
11. Krassov O. I. Pravo sobstvennosti na zemlyu v stranakh Evropy [Ownership of the Land in European Countries]. Moscow, 2014. 400 p. (In Russ.).
12. Kurdinovskiy V. I. K ucheniyu o legal'nykh ogranicheniyakh prava sobstvennosti na nedvi¬zhimost' v Rossii [To the Doctrine of Legal Restrictions on the Ownership of Real Estate in Russia]. Odessa, 1899. 396 p. (In Russ.).
13. Markin S. V. Sovershenstvovaniye pravovogo regulirovaniya prava sobstvennosti na zemel'¬nye uchastki [Development of Legal Regulation of the Property Right to the Ground Areas]. Pravovye voprosy nedvizhimosti ‒ Legal Issues of Real Estate. 2012. Issue 2. Pp. 21‒24. (In Russ.).
14. Nykänen P. Priobretenie zemli i stroitel'stvo v Finlyandii [Purchase of Land and Constructing in Finland]. Transl. by I. Prilezhaev. St. Peters¬burg, 2009. 159 p. (In Russ.)
15. Pravo sobstvennosti: aktual'nye problemy; otv. red. V. N. Litovkin, E. A. Sukhanov, V. V. Chu¬barov [Ownership: Current Problems; ed. by V. N. Litovkin, E. A. Sukhanov, V. V. Chuba¬rov]. Moscow, 2008. 731 p. (In Russ.).
16. Sukhanov E. A. Veshchnoe pravo. Nauchno-poznavatel'nyy ocherk [Property Law. Scien-tific and Educational Essay]. Moscow, 2017. 560 p. (In Russ.).
17. Chubarov V. V. Problemy pravovogo reguliro¬vaniya nedvizhimosti [Problems of Legal Regulation of Real Estate]. Moscow, 2006. 336 p. (In Russ.).
18. Khvostov V. M. Sistema rimskogo prava [Sys¬tem of Roman Law]. Moscow, 1996. 522 p. (In Russ).
19. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava [Textbook on Civil Law]. Moscow, 1995. 556 p. (In Russ).
20. Doskow E., Guillen L. Neighbor Law: Fences, Trees, Boundaries & Noise. Berkerly, СА: Nolo Press, 2017. 355 p. (In Eng.).
21. Finck M., Ranchordás S. Sharing and the city. Available at: http:// SSRN-id2741575 (accessed 12.01.2018). (In Eng.).
22. Freyfogle E. T. Property rights, the market, and environmental change in twentieth-century America. Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers. Series Research Paper. 2001. Issue 00–01. November. Available at: http://ssrn.
com/abstract=id907842 (accessed 12.01.2018). (In Eng.).
23. Gierke O. Deutshes Privatrecht. Zweiter Band. Sachenrecht. Leipzig, 1905. 598 p. (In Germ.).
24. Iro G. Bürgerliches recht. B. IV. Sachenrecht. Dritte Auflage, Wien, New York, 2008. 270 p. (In Germ.).
25. Jordan C. Neighbor Law: Fences, Trees, Boun¬daries & Noise. Berkeley, CA: Nolo Press, 1998. 352 p. (In Eng.).
26. Koziol H., Welser R. Grundriss des burgerli-chen Rechts. B.1. Allgemeiner Teil, Sachenrecht, Familienrecht, Wien, 2006. 570 p. (In Germ.).
27. Kurzynsky-Singer E., Zarandia T. Rezeption des deutschen Sachenrechts in Georgien. Max Planck Private Law Research Paper. 2014. Issue 14/10. Pp. 107‒138. (In Germ.).
28. Michael P. Vandenbergh. The Private Life of Public Law. Vanderbilt University Law School Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper. No. 05–16. Available at: http:// ssrn-id729363 (accessed 12.01.2018). (In Eng.).
29. Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlicher Gesetzbuch. 4. Auflage. Band 6. Sachenrecht. § 854‒1296. München, 2004. 2628 p. (In Germ.).
30. Ostrom E., Hess Ch. Private and common pro¬perty rights. Encyclopedia of Law and Eco¬nomics. 2007. Available at: http://ssrn.com/ab¬stract=1304699 (accessed 12.01.18). (In Eng.).
31. Schwab K.H., Prütting H. Sachenrecht. 32 Auflage, München, 2006. 379 p. (In Germ.).
32. Smith J. Ch. Some preliminary thoughts on the law of neighbors. Georgia Journal of Inter¬national and Comparative Law. 02/17/2012. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2054732 (accessed 12.01.2018). (In Eng.).
33. Snow N. Accessing the Internet Through the Neighbor's Wireless Internet Connection: Phy¬sical Trespass in Virtual Reality. Nebraska Law Review. Vol. 84:1226. Available at: http://ssrn.
com/abstract=id907842 (accessed 12.01.18). (In Eng.).
34. Tripp J. Neighbor Law. Oregon Live. (Reprinted from: The Oregonian. September 9, 1991). Available at: https://www.portland-oregon1991.gov/trees/article/528109 (accessed 12.01.2018). (In Eng.).
35. Vieweg K., Werner A. Sachenrecht. 3. Auflage. Köln, München, 2007. 664 p. (In Germ.).
Financing: The article was prepared as part of a scientific project supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No. 17-03-00691)
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year